Hacker News

points by tkahnoski 12 hours ago | 0 comments

I think the argument here is if you allow delivery to become a local monopoly like other utilities then just make it a utility. However as-is, there's little barrier to entry on adding delivery to any business and it should probably stay that way.

Is it necessary? No. Unfortunately I don't think would be great as a utility because quality of service matters and unlike the actual utilities, there's a lot of arbitrariness to quality of the service.

Availability of vehicles for delivery purposes is an interesting proposition. Charge doordash a tax or fee to maintain a fleet of vehicles that would open flexibility in the job market. (Consider this for ride-sharing as well... basically just reinvented the taxi medallion system but maybe with less restriction).

[–] jesse_dot_id 12 hours ago

I think the best idea would be a free and open source Doordash clone. The local government would contract a local company to handle logistics, so it would still be a private company (like garbage collection), but ideally lots of them spread out through the country. Each local government would decide if it's fully paid for by taxes, subsidized by taxes, etc (like garbage collection). City vehicles repaired/maintained by mechanics like school busses, etc.

[–] drdec 12 hours ago

> I think the argument here is if you allow delivery to become a local monopoly

What monopoly? I can barely remember all the companies in this space, GrubHub, UberEats, PostMates, etc.

[–] haliskerbas 12 hours ago

PostMates was acquired by Uber almost 6 years ago. https://investor.uber.com/news-events/news/press-release-det...