Hacker News
points by Groxx 13 hours ago | 0 comments
I mostly blame the near-complete abandonment of the product. It was quite clear even early on that it did not work very well for time-sensitive knowledge, and that having any of that cluttered the search results badly, but nothing at all was ever done to address that, despite nearly all of Stack Overflow fitting in that category.

IMO the uselessness of the answers just became more and more apparent, so fewer people contributed, so they rotted further. Good riddance, I say - it had a brief couple years where it was excellent because all information was new enough to be useful, and then it started dying like all stagnant things do.

Stack Exchanges that do not have such a bias for time-sensitive information are still going relatively well AFAICT, e.g. math exchange. The model works fine for some things, just not general tech assistance.

[–] mixmastamyk 13 hours ago
The Trending (recent votes count more) feature was implemented years ago. Not perfect, but helps a lot.
[–] Groxx 13 hours ago
All I've ever seen that do is move "the top answer doesn't work" (usually with no reference to which top answer) to the top. I fully believe it can help, but uh. Nowhere near enough.
[–] mixmastamyk 12 hours ago
Not my experience. If there is a new answer it usually brings it to the top or near it.