points by OJFord 14 hours ago | 0 comments
Using 'they' for an unknown gender has nothing to do with people 'identifying' as they, or anything modern.
It's never been 'he', except in sexism such as 'when the doctor comes he will examine you' (with the doctor's identity and hence gender unknown, but assumed male by profession).
[–] spauldo 9 hours ago
[–] OJFord 9 hours ago
Maybe it's an American thing.
[–] spauldo 2 hours ago
Maybe! Although I doubt it. Honestly, if you're really curious about it it's best to ask a local language expert if you have access to a university. I'm just an old computer geek with a higher-than-average interest in the written word.
This might make a good subject for a RobWords video, actually.
Seriously, read anything more than about fifty years old. The 1918 Strunk & White¹ stated, "Use the masculine pronoun unless the antecedent is or must be feminine." They argued against inclusive pronouns in the 70s when E. B. White (yeah, the mouse guy) was in charge of the style book, and didn't start recommending inclusive language until the 2000 edition.
The Chicago Manual of Style originally didn't mention it because it was so ingrained in the English language. It only started discouraging its use in 1982, and didn't condemn it until 2010.
Edit: I guess I should state right here that I'm not advocating for default male pronouns in writing. I think "they" is the best replacement. But I was taught "he" and adapted to "he/she" over the years. "They" really only seems to have become prevalent over the last decade or so.
¹That's Strunk and White the style book, not Strunk/White slash fiction.