I'd be happy to answer that question if you posed it straight, rather than as a an attempted dunk. Of course, the search bar on this thread will lead you to plenty of additional conversation about the vulnerability and the attempts to downplay it.
Seriously? You replied to what I said with no follow up and a hazy premise and now you want me to take your leash and lead you through your own argument?
[–] ofjcihen 8 hours ago
[–] tptacek 8 hours ago
[–] ofjcihen 8 hours ago
You have to be the single worst HN celebrity.
[–] Dylan16807 7 hours ago
> which I’m sure surprises you
You caused the problem here. You started off being hazy and rude.
"Say that again without trying to dunk on anyone if you want me to put effort into responding." seems like a pretty reasonable trade.
[–] sudo_intellect 7 hours ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50189820
You actually participated in it and called cyber security researchers addicted to likes. Ironic.
[–] ghjkghjkghj 6 hours ago
also, psuedo cybersecurity researchers are definitely addicted to likes.
edited: looks like half of that post even agrees with them so i mean...?