points by grey-area 7 hours ago | 0 comments
Oh so you're saying a central authority can declare your currency worthless at any time? Good to know. Sounds very like a central bank issued currency though?
[–] dlubarov 3 hours ago
This is a purely optional part of the crypto ecosystem, so I don't see how it's an argument against crypto in general.
One can also burn tokens, just as one can burn cash, but we don't tend to hold that against either systems since it's purely optional.
[–] cowlevel 7 hours ago
Stablecoins are literally central banks. Decentralised coins are literally decentralised central banks. Bitcoin's algorithm is a central bank.
[–] grey-area 7 hours ago
Well I don't think they're very decentralised, which was the original premise.
Any rules can and have been changed by those with leverage to do so (be that exchanges, miners or devs), in the end any system like this storing value is captured and controlled.
[–] broken-kebab 4 hours ago
They are decentralized cause they operate on a sort of consensus between nodes as was original premise. Are they "very decentralized" depends on your definition of "very", of course, and techical realities of a particular situation.
[–] icepush 6 hours ago
Decentralized central banks - are these the finance equivalent of dehydrated water ?
[1] https://etherscan.io/address/0xdAC17F958D2ee523a220620699459...