points by miohtama 4 hours ago | 0 comments
Stablecoins are frozen so the hole will likely be around two billion dollars.
Binance has equity and cash flow cover this, outside the insurance fund.
They custody $150B.
FTX was larger in dollar terms and ecosystem was smaller back in a day.
[–] weakened_malloc 3 hours ago
they borrowed ETH against the stablecoins on AAVE before they were frozen
[–] pigeons 1 hour ago
Doesn't matter how much they custody!
[–] jazzyjackson 3 hours ago
Uh don’t you not want to cover losses with customer funds?
[–] pbhjpbhj 1 hour ago
Put some pyramid in that blockchain?!
[–] ahartmetz 1 hour ago
Recursive pyramids!
[–] rootedbox 4 hours ago
[–] fragsworth 1 hour ago
If a massive heist like this triggered a run on one of the largest exchanges (Binance), potentially leading to a liquidity crisis, the consequences for the ecosystem could be far worse than temporarily freezing specific addresses holding stolen stablecoins.
Not saying that's what would have happened, but it seemed like a real possibility. And I'm not saying freezing assets is good in general, but in this particular case, maybe it was the lesser evil.
[–] idiotsecant 20 minutes ago
I want crypto because I don't trust nation states with the leverage and dials of fiat currency. All we've done is replace government with trusting whoever made a particular stablecoin.
Permissionless crypto is the only real crypto.
[–] dboreham 3 minutes ago
[–] paulpauper 4 hours ago
[–] nradov 3 hours ago
[–] mirashii 3 hours ago
[–] nradov 2 hours ago
[–] platinumrad 2 hours ago
[–] mirashii 28 minutes ago
[–] idiotsecant 19 minutes ago
[–] Forgeties79 1 hour ago
Seriously?
[–] tarpitt 3 hours ago
Oh you didn't know? I bet you trade in "dollars". That's cute.
[–] lazide 3 hours ago
[–] cyanydeez 3 hours ago