Why should I not just vibe code my own solution? - Its a hassle to maintain a version online.
[–] hypfer 23 hours ago
[–] denismenace 22 hours ago
It doesn't work as a self-hosted service, because you need to be able to quickly share a link with other participants.
It's not a honeypot.
[–] kinduff 12 hours ago
Sorry but it doesn't work with your current architecture, but it is in fact possible to have the same functionality even within a network/VPN/Tailnet, or with your own domain, like all self-hosted apps do.
[–] albert_e 1 day ago
But in quite a few cases presenter would want to control when information is presented/revealed to audience.
[–] nico 1 day ago
[–] hughlilly 1 day ago
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/teams/meetings/share-sli...
[–] timothyduong 1 day ago
[–] denismenace 1 day ago
[–] WorldMaker 16 hours ago
If you've got multiple monitors, just present to a different monitor, with or without Presenter View (which shows notes and such) and screen share only the monitor with the slides.
If you're on a single monitor (which ultrawides are making more somewhat common again), you can go to Slide Show > Set Up Slide Show and switch the Presentation Type to "Browsed by an Individual" which keeps the slide show windowed, but hides most controls and focuses just on the slides, then screen share only that window. At the moment PowerPoint still doesn't support Presenter View when running slides this way, possibly because it predates modern ultrawides and people didn't have the screen space before to have multiple such windows open side by side.
("Browsed by an Individual" is also stupidly hard to discover if you have never had reason to "Set Up Slide Show", a dialog somewhat more common in 90s PowerPoint because the flow sometimes was that you would need to "Set Up" before you could F5 launch it. I've seen so many company presentations presented with the full fat PPT normal/editing view window simply because no one knows to look for "Browsed by an Individual" to focus the slides.)
[–] albert_e 1 hour ago
Thanks for teaching me something!
[–] denismenace 1 day ago
[–] 8organicbits 1 day ago
In the past I have liked marp (https://marp.app/) for technical slides as you write in markdown, can use version control, etc. Powerpoint always felt odd as a developer.
To share public slides I've published to GitHub pages (https://github.com/robalexdev/marp-to-pages). I've seen professors use it for all their slides. But that doesn't synchronize slides, last I checked.
[–] NicuCalcea 1 day ago
[–] antonly 1 day ago
[–] denismenace 1 day ago
I wanted to first know if people would like something like this.
[–] jrm4 1 day ago
Just have a VM that you tell Zoom or whatnot is the "window to present" Now you can do anything, slides and more, and also that thing can be the only publicly seen thing, your computer stays private.
[–] netsharc 1 day ago
[–] denismenace 21 hours ago
[–] cubbieapp 10 hours ago
[–] jayknight 1 day ago
Webex has this as well, but I find that most people don't bother and just share their screen.
[–] htrp 1 day ago
[–] denismenace 1 day ago
I wanted to see if anybody wants this too, and hopefully develop it into a business.
[–] dingdongdingdon 1 day ago
[–] denismenace 23 hours ago
[–] shakewingo 1 day ago
[–] sublinear 1 day ago
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/powerpoint/present-from-...
I see your idea and I suppose there is value in it, but the problem of screen sharing is basically fictional compared to the real problem of someone just uploading company data (+ metadata!) to a random service some random person came up with.
Screen sharing only shares pixels and does so through parties that the economy considers trustworthy enough.
This is not going to work as the SaaS you seem to envision it to be. It might work for a self-hosted internal service thing or a group of friends though.
___
Thinking about this, I suspect that at least one naive bored corporate guy browsing HN will have tried this out with a random pptx they had lying around on their work computer. The data is now.. somewhere.
So this could be an actual honeypot.