points by preg_match 1 day ago | 0 comments
Yes, systemd is not one piece of software, it’s a collection of software, like GNU. The components aren’t just modules or something, they’re actually different programs altogether.
When people say systemd they really mean systemd-init, which is one piece of software. Not systemd-resolved, which is another.
[–] cowlevel 1 day ago
[–] preg_match 1 day ago
Most distributions only use some of them, and the “some” set is different from distro to distro. Many distros swap parts out. And some distros only use systemd-resolved.
Systemd is, legitimately, well divided. Most of the complaints against systemd are from people who know basically nothing about systemd.
[–] cowlevel 1 day ago
[–] preg_match 1 day ago
[–] cowlevel 1 day ago
How many pieces of software is nginx or Apache, where every feature is an optional plugin?
[–] gf000 22 hours ago
E.g. explorer.exe is not replaceable on windows so the display server and that is one software. (The kernel is NOT though, because it can surely run in a headless way). It's not that hard of a concept..
[–] cowlevel 21 hours ago
[–] gf000 22 hours ago
systemd-init has nothing to do with network resolution.
[–] cowlevel 21 hours ago
systemd-journald is a nicer example though.