[–] weystrom 2 days ago
I think I'll keep my Framework 13 Pro preorder.
[–] cosmic_cheese 2 days ago
It’s not bad, but I find it still to be very much an acquired taste. It’s fine for my usage, where the DE has barely any impact but having been using macOS as my main OS for the better part of 30 years, it would probably drive me insane if I had to shift my main body of computer use to it. It’s not any one thing, but dozens of papercuts that can’t be configured away (I’d need to maintain my own fork to fix them) as well as the more Windows-like desktop paradigm.
[–] Matl 2 days ago
Exactly how I feel about having to use macOS at work, except some of the 'configurations away' are overpriced plugins/third party tools.
[–] cosmic_cheese 2 days ago
This is why I think it's important that there's a wealth of different desktops available to use that represent a variety of different paradigms, particularly in the context of Linux on the desktop. Desktop Linux represents the ultimate in potential to mold the computer to the user instead of the reverse, and it really bums me out to see suggestions or implications that would-be Linux users should just accept a Windows-ish shape or tiling keyboard-driven shape and stop hoping for something more Mac-like (which as an aside, GNOME is not despite superficial appearances).
[–] alt227 2 days ago
At least this is an option with Linux
[–] cosmic_cheese 2 days ago
[–] alt227 2 days ago
[–] nozzlegear 2 days ago
[–] kev009 2 days ago
[–] cdelsolar 2 days ago
Still I’m very tempted by the new MacBooks. I don’t know of any laptop that is a tenth as good and I don’t want to sit at my desk all day to use a computer.
[–] gosub100 2 days ago
I love and respect what Asahi has done but I want apple to support a turn key, open drivers, everything works, system.
[–] psadauskas 2 days ago
[–] tpmoney 2 days ago
It seems to me like they are indeed just “not supporting” it, to the fullest extent possible.
[–] KerrAvon 2 days ago
[–] 100percentjake 2 days ago
[–] elicash 2 days ago
Edit: the thing I'm confused about is it seems there are at least two but maybe three different things that they are calling "nano-texture". On buying screens, the Studio Display and iPad Mini say "Nano-texture glass" and the new MacBook Pro says "Nano-texture display." But the Duo marketing says "Nano-texture finish."
I get that the internal Duo screen has the film over it and so it says "finish," but is there a difference between "glass" and "display"?
[–] rickdeckard 2 days ago
"Nano-texture finish" on iPhone Duo refers to an additional layer they put on top of the display panel. It's basically a sticker with a similar (same?) surface structure (they can't put it on the display glass itself because it's too thin)
[–] floydnoel 2 days ago
[–] elicash 2 days ago
[–] layer8 2 days ago
[–] codeduck 2 days ago
[–] Hates_ 2 days ago
> Made with soft, non-abrasive material, the Polishing Cloth cleans any Apple display, including nano-texture, safely and effectively.
[–] goatking 2 days ago
[–] brailsafe 2 days ago
I will say that it's the best cloth ever, and the nano upgrade is worth it
[–] commandersaki 2 days ago
[–] resters 2 days ago
[–] Havoc 2 days ago
[–] unregistereddev 2 days ago
My guess is this photo was taken in a local garden co-op or small farmstead, but it looked too barren to use for advertising so they added a bunch of plants later.
[–] lp92 2 days ago
[–] eli 2 days ago
[–] financetechbro 2 days ago
[–] FinnKuhn 2 days ago
[–] bombcar 2 days ago
They missed a chance to have the lady holding an iPad though.
[–] unregistereddev 2 days ago
Yeah this was a big miss. Farmers typically don't bring laptops out into the field, but tablets are extremely common. Tablets aren't nearly as susceptible to damage from dirt and dust and are easier to use on the go.
[–] ZeroCool2u 2 days ago
It was November/December in Iowa, so it was freezing and the local R/C club airfield was nestled between an ocean of corn fields and the city dump, so it smelled terrible.
But that 16" MBP was red hot from Android Studio and kept my fingers from freezing, so credit where credit is due. Really fun project too!
[–] nozzlegear 2 days ago
That's just how Iowa smells. If anything, the city dump was probably improving things!
/s
lived here my whole life, it's an olfactory adventure :P
[–] nozzlegear 2 days ago
[–] phainopepla2 2 days ago
[–] rubyfan 2 days ago
[–] kotaKat 2 days ago
[–] paxy 2 days ago
[–] eli 2 days ago
[–] bcvvvy 2 days ago
[–] paxy 2 days ago
It is especially annoying during resale or benchmarking, because “M5 Pro” by itself doesn't mean much, and you have to count the number of CPU & GPU cores to figure out the actual SKU.
[–] 100percentjake 2 days ago
[–] tacon 2 days ago
[–] drum55 2 days ago
[–] paxy 2 days ago
[–] drum55 2 days ago
Chip: Apple M5
Total Number of Cores: 10 (4 Super and 6 Efficiency)
Same amount of information, just formatted differently ultimately.[–] timpera 2 days ago
[–] SomeonesAccount 2 days ago
[–] timpera 2 days ago
I used to be able to completely boot into Windows on my Intel mac a few years ago, but Apple no longer supports it for some reason. It's a shame, especially since the ARM64 version of Windows 11 has gotten very good now.
It would also be nice to be able to install Linux too. It's my own hardware, after all!
[–] ericmay 2 days ago
You can install both Windows and Linux on MacBooks. For Windows you may need to buy Parallels[1] or something but you can do it.
[–] timpera 2 days ago
Looks like you're right about Linux though, I didn't know about Asahi Linux. Thank you for sharing.
[–] ericmay 2 days ago
Sadly I also can't natively install my Nintendo Switch software on my Xbox.
[–] well_ackshually 2 days ago
[–] freeone3000 2 days ago
As for linux, https://asahilinux.org/ currently supports M1/M2 quite well, and is approaching ready on M3+
[–] TheDong 2 days ago
Apple should be forced to release the necessary hardware specs to develop drivers so that I can use my hardware I purchased as I want. They should be required to let me own my own signing keys to boot my own software.
Anyway, I'd personally want bootcamp because it's a step closer to being able to install Linux, an operating system that lets me have a good tiling window manager that works.
Why the heck would anyone want to use macOS willingly, where the window manager and file browser are both complete unconfigurable trash.
[–] rTX5CMRXIfFG 2 days ago
[–] jimbokun 2 days ago
[–] rTX5CMRXIfFG 2 days ago
[–] bigyabai 2 days ago
[–] philistine 2 days ago
On top of that, Windows 11 requires a TPM and Apple's implementation of the Secure Enclave is probably completely incompatible. The short moment in time when both computer families were in complete technological harmony is over.
[–] bigyabai 2 days ago
To repeat myself, there is no valid technical reason that Apple cannot commit to documenting their platform for third-parties. People will complain, because it's an arbitrary choice on Apple's behalf to provide less transparent support than AMD, Intel or even the famously capricious Nvidia.
This has the knock-on effect of limiting macOS' exposure to third-party OS competition, enabling Apple to subsidize macOS support with SaaS offerings and advertisements. Apple customers have been increasingly asking for official Linux support on Apple Silicon, because macOS and iPadOS are not legitimate competitors to Windows or Linux. Apple Silicon is undoubtedly the second-class citizen of the PC world, and it's entirely Apple's choice to limit their hardware like that.
[–] SJMG 2 days ago
How about suffer a lightly deoptimized workflow on one platform for the interoperability of the ecosystem…?
[–] layer8 2 days ago
[–] ta8903 2 days ago
If you could install linux, however, then I would buy one yesterday.
[–] SuperShibe 2 days ago
[–] TheDong 2 days ago
[–] tonyedgecombe 2 days ago
[–] SJMG 2 days ago
[–] alt227 2 days ago
[–] dwaltrip 2 days ago
[–] freeone3000 2 days ago
You might be better off waiting for an Asahi linux update.
[–] edude03 2 days ago
I'm pretty sure bootcamp was only a thing specifically because the intel macs were essentially white box windows laptops with a nicer than average trackpad for the time. Trackpad drivers is a much smaller lift when everything else practically works out of the box
[–] mococa 2 days ago
[–] timpera 2 days ago
[–] Synaesthesia 2 days ago
[–] gniv 2 days ago
[–] hurfdurf 2 days ago
And it's still $1999.
Because the price hike happened in June, in this case from 1699 to 1999.https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48672732 https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/apple-raises-pric...
[–] Hamuko 2 days ago
[–] gniv 2 days ago
[–] haseebws94 2 days ago
https://nanoreview.net/en/cpu-compare/apple-m6-12-core-vs-ap...
[–] gniv 2 days ago
[–] tefkah 2 days ago
[–] fckgw 2 days ago
If the Base M6 is good enough processor for you but want a more "premium" product, then the base Pro makes sense.
[–] foldr 2 days ago
[–] philistine 2 days ago
[–] rjrjrjrj 2 days ago
Also, there is no M6 Air yet.
[–] culopatin 2 days ago
[–] gniv 2 days ago
[–] mono442 2 days ago
[–] magicmicah85 2 days ago
[–] alberth 2 days ago
Makes me now wonder what's in store for tomorrow's pro launch.
[–] mastry 2 days ago
[–] edude03 2 days ago
The major thing I notice about modern apple is they definitely rush to meet a deadline instead of just waiting for the product to be ready
[–] RobGR 2 days ago
[–] jimbokun 2 days ago
[–] carruler 2 days ago
[–] cmenge 2 days ago
[–] dofm 2 days ago
The base M6 is faster (much much faster) than the M1 Max at prefill (compute bound).
The M1 Max outperforms the base M6 at token generation; this is memory-bandwidth-bound, and while the M1 Max can't actually saturate its memory bandwidth, it gets a lot closer with the GPU.
So I suspect the M6 is better if your AI tasks are decision-based or video/image based, and the M1 Max is better if you're running a coding LLM. Though prefill is a bit of an issue.
[–] throwaway270925 2 days ago
[–] artimaeis 2 days ago
[–] fckgw 2 days ago
[–] NoPicklez 2 days ago
Even if that were the case, it doesn't point to there being a power supply shortage which is the point the original commenter was making.
[–] throwaway270925 1 day ago
The power supply shortage was obviously tongue in cheek dude!
[–] ericmay 2 days ago
Am I missing something?
(since I'm rate limited)....
With the OP's comment "guess its a use-once device now..." I was thinking they meant power supply in the desktop sense, not the power adapter. I have no idea why a power adapter would be the thing that makes a laptop a "use-once" device.
But yes in the configuration options you can choose between two power adapters.
[–] entrope 2 days ago
I appreciate the frustration, but as a separate item then a user can choose any power supply on the market, rather than being stuck with one that Apple chose.
[–] artimaeis 2 days ago
[–] tonyedgecombe 2 days ago
[–] artimaeis 2 days ago
Edit: Even today if you go to the Macbook Pro config tool you get to choose between the standard 70 W or upgraded 96 W.
[–] petetnt 2 days ago
[–] cmdrmac 2 days ago
[–] lettergram 2 days ago
[–] Danox 2 days ago
[–] bigyabai 2 days ago
Apple has no experience running large fabs, manufacturing modern DDR4 or DDR5, negotiating for precursors, packaging memory, integrating packages, optimizing DRAM efficiency, yield tuning or process sampling & qualification testing. It's equally as absentminded as suggesting that Apple simply replace TSMC with ASMC, their in-house EUV fab that can make 3nm wafers with 100% yield. Samsung has been making memory for 40 years, and they can't compete with SK Hynix' output despite their experience in design and fabrication. And Samsung is a success story, relatively speaking.
Apple cannot supply themselves at the iPhones scale, and would bankrupt themselves binning DDR5 for 512GB Macs. The US could give Apple the entirety of Intel Foundry Services as an act of corrupt eminent domain, and Apple would still be 15 years away from supplying their own RAM. DDR5 fabs are a small club, and Apple ain't in it.
[–] tonyedgecombe 2 days ago
[–] skrtks 2 days ago
Which one should I pick?
[–] asenna 2 days ago
[–] scirob 2 days ago
[–] k310 2 days ago
Maybe this idea may be foreign to many, but personal computers were something I built from bags of parts socketed and/or soldered onto S-100 cards, and that experience was the foundation of most of my career.
I was a Henry Higgins, and proud of my Eliza(s). While I get along cooperatively with Eliza (the happy ending to "My Fair Computer") I don't want Eliza to be my caretaker. This morphing of computers and internet into nannies and caretakers is IMO reverting to the "good old days" of servants. While some inventions are truly liberating (ask the guy who missed his Mom at an airport and freaked out for hours until she showed up at my home, courtesy of a cab or bus) how many are just replacing people with machines?
I could seriously use some friendship of the human variety, rather than a humanoid in a box (or an especially nice robot as in "I Sing the Body Electric" by Ray Bradbury, memorable on The Twilight Zone) Try being older and living alone, typing away.
I don't even use GPS any more, since I trashed Apple Maps when they kissed the Emperor's big fanny.
[–] lettergram 2 days ago
> With 16GB of unified memory standard, configurable up to 32GB, and higher memory bandwidth up to 170GB/s, MacBook Pro makes multitasking and working with demanding apps and large projects even faster.
So they're basically removing the ability to run local models effectively. I wonder if they'll bifurcate their market to enable those.
[–] fckgw 2 days ago
[–] ericmay 2 days ago
No they won't, the market for "running local models" is approximately 0. There's nothing to bifurcate anyway because once they release the more capable chips they'll be able to be configured with hiring amounts of RAM.
Apple in recent years has been updating their laptop range or specific models (Air or something) with their latest base M series chip (M4, M5, M6, &c.) and then later comes the higher end CPUs. But the base series chips don't have the hardware to it seems support higher RAM loads, or maybe they are artificially restricted in some way.
[–] cbeach 2 days ago
The fastest M6 MacBook Pro (24/32GB config) has a memory bandwidth of 170 GB/s. And the M5 Max is 614 GB/s.
Am I missing some nuance of the M6 MBP here, or am I right to assume it won't set the local LLM world on fire?
[–] tpmoney 2 days ago
[–] moosedev 2 days ago
There's rumored to be no M6 Pro or M6 Max coming, i.e. the higher bandwidth chips will skip a gen. M7 is also rumored to have better memory bandwidth across the range.
[–] sgarrity 2 days ago
I probably complained when Apple offered too FEW options too - but hey, this is the Internet.
[–] onraglanroad 2 days ago
It seems like such an easy win and could rapidly become the most popular Linux distro, even running on non Apple hardware.
They have the money so why not just do it?
[–] jimbokun 2 days ago
[–] coreyh14444 2 days ago
[–] miller_joe 2 days ago
[–] elicash 2 days ago
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/10/25/macbook-pro-with-touchs...
[–] WillAdams 2 days ago
[–] the_sleaze_ 2 days ago
[–] ramses0 2 days ago
[–] eastbound 2 days ago
Do they get the same marketing impact?
[–] hurfdurf 2 days ago
https://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#mac https://buyersguide.macrumors.com/#ipad
[–] dylan604 2 days ago
[–] weird-eye-issue 2 days ago
[–] carlgreene 2 days ago
[–] SecretDreams 2 days ago
I'm in the 14-15 camp w/ lighter form factors being worth the premium.
I tried below 13 after the trend of smaller laptops from a couple years back - I now don't believe anyone who tells me they're regularly productive on these smaller form factors lol.
[–] nick_ 2 days ago
[–] DetroitThrow 2 days ago
It's much, much easier to transport even though I do miss the screen real estate.
[–] technothrasher 2 days ago
[–] eknkc 2 days ago
[–] commandersaki 2 days ago
Love both.
[–] icedchai 2 days ago
[–] kphorn 2 days ago
[–] dofm 2 days ago
[–] outlore 2 days ago
[–] dofm 2 days ago
I'm just saying, the base M6 is not very competitive in terms of memory bandwidth (the M5 Pro has about 80% faster memory bandwidth).
Compared with my old M1 Max, the M5 Pro is radically better at prefill, only about 15% slower at most at generation (and probably performs better at DFlash and MLX than the M1, so it might close the gap or even outperform the M1 Max)
So the models I am using/testing should all be quite fun, assuming the 48GB RAM machine. The Gemma 4 12B and LFM should run well on the 24GB machine. Neither of those are great coding models but they should be pretty good assistants. There are harsher quantisations of those other models that may fit.
Whether playing with these things locally is worth the extra spend, I don't know. It's probably more cost-effective to buy a cheaper Mac, experiment with the smaller models, and use Openrouter for the bigger ones.
[–] sealthedeal 2 days ago
[–] kingleopold 2 days ago
[–] ghoshbishakh 2 days ago
[–] cromka 2 days ago
So tired of their PR grandiose.
[–] arkwin 2 days ago
Also, what happened to the I/O?? I was happy to see on the M4 they had HDMI, an SD card slot, and more. Why are they back to 2 USB-C ports? I only see pictures of one side, but the left side has traditionally had more I/O.
C'mon, Apple, do better. It's a PRO model, not a MacBook Air
[–] tefkah 2 days ago
also, i don't blame you for this given that Apple's naming scheme is so fucked here but the 32gb limitation is for the MacBook Pro with the M6, _not_ the MacBook Pro with the M6 Pro or M6 Max. yes, that is confusing, but imo the standard MacBook "Pro" with the base M chip is basically a glorified MacBook Air with a better chassis. I feel like they only sell these things to make the Air seem like a better deal and to justify a higher price for the M Pro / Max versions
edit: those M Pro versions may be announced tomorrow alongside a version with, or those being the version with a touchscreen
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/10/25/macbook-pro-with-touchs...
[–] makmanalp 2 days ago
[–] FinnKuhn 2 days ago
[–] seabrookmx 2 days ago
I don't _need_ the battery life and still prefer to run Linux so the tradeoff is worth it to me, but for most users it's pretty hard to not recommend a Macbook.
[–] FinnKuhn 2 days ago
The thing is I never had a Mac(Book) before, but the hardware at the time was just so much ahead of anything else that I didn't mind that limitation. At least for what I bought it any OS (Windows/MacOS/Linux) would have been totally fine.
[–] riffraff 2 days ago
[–] pinktonio 2 days ago
[–] FinnKuhn 2 days ago
[–] KetoManx64 2 days ago
[–] anakaine 2 days ago
[–] ant6n 2 days ago
Every app window / browser tab is like 1GB these days.
[–] unsloppable 2 days ago
[–] rickdeckard 2 days ago
"You didn't even finish your M2 yet and already want to refill your plate?"
[–] yunnpp 2 days ago
Edit: guys, come up, muster some sense of humor. This screen is only 14" after all.
[–] neilsimp1 2 days ago
[–] pbasista 2 days ago
On top of that, the drives might be somehow paired to the motherboard. And I would imagine that pairing a new one with the existing motherboard may require some proprietary software that only Apple has.
These are only my assumptions though. People e.g. at Louis Rossmann's repair shop might know more.
[–] philistine 2 days ago
[–] 233mhz 2 days ago
[–] AppleBananaPie 2 days ago
[–] lynndotpy 2 days ago
It is funny because the video is 50 minutes long which requires a difficult soldering job and chip reprogramming. This does not include the process of opening the Macbook Pro, disassembling it, removing the logic board, nor the reverse process.
[–] mycall 1 day ago
[–] bel_marinaio 2 days ago
[–] arghwhat 2 days ago
If you throw enough money at a sufficiently skilled technician it can be done, but no M.2 slots in sight here.
[–] hias 2 days ago
[–] neilsimp1 1 day ago
I'm disappointed a mainstream laptop is soldered, though. Why would anyone buy it?
[–] alt227 2 days ago
[–] DaSHacka 2 days ago
[–] telesilla 2 days ago
[–] peezd 2 days ago
[–] rTX5CMRXIfFG 2 days ago
[–] SOLAR_FIELDS 2 days ago
[–] makmanalp 2 days ago
[–] dreamcompiler 2 days ago
Plus it runs Asahi linux on the metal.
[–] makmanalp 2 days ago
[–] jonpurdy 2 days ago
The only reason I’m bitter is because they put in WiFi 6E in the M3 generation. Now I just use a 2.5Gbe USB-C adaptor when transferring large files to and from my NAS.
[–] exe34 2 days ago
[–] seemaze 2 days ago
[–] karim79 2 days ago
[–] qubex 2 days ago
The machine is basically flawless and entirely suitable for everything I throw at it (and throw stuff at it I do: when I’m not web-browsing or playing YouTube videos I’m using Wolfram Mathematica, which is one heck of a resource hog) and it’s absolutely utterly fine and blasé about the whole thing.
As things are, I can see myself keeping it for a decade. There was a time when I used to change Apple laptops on a yearly basis (starting with PowerBook G4s in the early/mid 2000s and up until the mid 2010s, when I migrated most of my mobile computing to iPads… which lasted for about a decade until I got this thing).